Produce Cess Tanzania: The 3% Cap, Who Pays, Transit Receipts and Council By-laws

How much produce cess can a Tanzanian council charge, and who pays it? On the Mainland, a district council may charge produce cess on crops grown in its area, payable at source. The Local Government Finances Act, Cap. 290 caps crop cess at 3% of the farm-gate price for cash and food crops. The buyer pays. Councils may not tax sellers, seeds, or crops of up to 1 ton moved between districts.
This guide explains produce cess Tanzania rules for buyers, traders, processors and exporters: the statutory cap, the council by-law, who collects it, why one receipt should carry a lorry through other districts, how it sits beside crop board levies and the service levy, penalties and seizure, Zanzibar, and a costed 30 tonne sesame consignment.
What the law says
Produce cess is a local government charge. It is not a TRA tax, and it is not a crop board levy. Its home is the Local Government Finances Act, Cap. 290. The Attorney General's office published the Revised Edition 2023, Annual Supplement 2025, which carries amendments to 31 July 2025. It was signed in Dodoma on 28 October 2025. Four provisions do the work.
- Section 7(1)(g), district councils. A district council's revenue includes "all moneys derived from any cess payable at source on any agricultural or other produce" grown in its area. The cess may be imposed under Cap. 290 or any other written law. For major export crops, the paragraph says the cess "shall range between zero and five percent of the farm-gate price".
- Section 6(1)(u), urban authorities. City, municipal and town councils have a matching power for produce grown in their area. For major export crops it sets a ceiling of five percent of the farm-gate price, also payable at source.
- Section 17, by-laws and the Schedule. A council imposes a rate by by-law, subject to the Act and the Minister's rules (s.17(1)). It may not charge anything listed in the third column of the Schedule (s.17(2)). Section 17(7) adds that corporate entities paying the service levy "shall not be liable to pay the produce cess".
- The Schedule, item 1. Headed "produce cess on buyers", it caps crop cess at 3% of the farm-gate price on cash crops and 3% on food crops. Forest produce cess is capped at 3% of the farm-gate price or volume at source. The barred column lists a cess above 3%, a cess on sellers, a cess on seeds, and a "plying fee for transportation of crops not exceeding 1 ton from one district to another".
The Schedule was rewritten by the Finance Act 2017 (Act No. 4 of 2017, section 32). The Revised Edition 2019 on the Ministry of Finance site carries that annotation. Before 2017, councils could charge up to 5% and rates varied widely. A Feed the Future analysis on Agrilinks by Mwambulukutu, Minde and Nyange describes the cut to 3% and the 1 ton exemption.
A common belief is that food crops carry a lower cap than cash crops. The current Schedule prints 3% for both. A council may set a lower rate in its by-law, and many do.
Who is affected
- Crop buyers and traders who buy maize, rice, beans, sesame, sunflower or pulses from farmers or AMCOS and truck them to markets or ports;
- Processors such as millers, oil pressers, ginneries and tea factories, which buy raw produce in rural districts;
- Exporters, because COPRA asks for the council's electronic crop levy receipt before it issues an export permit;
- Licensed buyers of board crops such as cashew, cotton, coffee and tobacco, where cess is settled through the auction or AMCOS system;
- Timber and charcoal dealers, who face the separate 3% forest produce cess;
- Farmers and transporters, who need to know that a seller cannot be taxed and that a load of up to 1 ton cannot be charged a plying fee.
Cess matters to councils. A 2016 Michigan State University ASPIRES policy brief found it is "as much as 90%" of locally generated revenue for several rural councils. That explains why checkpoints are busy, and why traders should carry clean paperwork.
Who pays produce cess, the farmer or the buyer?
The buyer pays. The Schedule item is titled "produce cess on buyers", and the third column forbids a "cess on sellers". A council that deducts cess from a farmer's price as a separate charge is outside the Act. A buyer who pays the farmer the full agreed price and then pays the council is inside it.
Economics is another matter. Buyers price the cess into what they offer, so part of it reaches the farmer through a lower farm-gate price. That is a market effect, not a legal liability. In auction systems the cess appears on the buyer's invoice. The TMX commodity trading procedure of 12 February 2026 lists the per-kilogram charges for sesame and pulses, each followed by "+ 3% CESS", and says other charges "will be paid by the buyer on top of winning price per kilogram".
How much is the cess, and what is the base?
The Act sets a ceiling. The actual rate is whatever the council's by-law says, at or below the cap. The base is the farm-gate price, not the export price or the wholesale price in Dar es Salaam.
| Item | Rule | Source | Register ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crop cess, cash crops | Cap of 3% of farm-gate price | Cap. 290 Schedule item 1 | F0547 |
| Crop cess, food crops | Cap of 3% of farm-gate price | Cap. 290 Schedule item 1 | F0547 |
| Forest produce cess | Cap of 3% of farm-gate price or volume at source | Cap. 290 Schedule item 1 | NEW-05-27 |
| Major export crops | 0% to 5% of farm-gate price, payable at source | Cap. 290 ss.6(1)(u), 7(1)(g) | F0547 |
| Cess on sellers or on seeds | Barred | Cap. 290 Schedule, third column | F0547 |
| Plying fee on crops up to 1 ton moved between districts | Barred | Cap. 290 Schedule, third column | F0547, NEW-05-27 |
| Service levy | 0.25% of turnover net of VAT and excise | Cap. 290 s.7(1)(z); Finance Act 2025 | F0283 |
One tension needs care. Sections 6(1)(u) and 7(1)(g) allow up to 5% for "major export crops". The Schedule bars any cess above 3%. The fee register reads the two together and treats 3% as the working ceiling. If a council by-law charges more than 3% on any crop, ask for its written basis before paying, and take advice.
The farm-gate price is not defined in the Act. Councils often publish an indicative price per bag or per kilogram in the by-law, or apply the cess per unit. In auction crops the base may be the winning price. The TMX procedure does not say whether its 3% runs on the winning price alone or on the price plus charges. Confirm the base in writing.
Is cess paid once, or in every district?
Cess is "payable at source". That means the council where the produce was grown and bought collects it. A council the lorry merely passes through has no produce grown in its area to tax. The receipt from the source council is the trader's evidence that cess has been paid.
The Act has no section headed "one cess per consignment". The rule follows from the words "at source" and "produced in the area". Traders still report repeat demands. The May 2026 ANAPRI and Sokoine University trade brief records private sector complaints about levies multiplying "across districts, checkpoints and agencies". It recommends harmonised, capped local levies and removal of duplicated district charges.
In practice, a transiting load should carry:
- the source council's electronic cess receipt, matching the quantity and crop on the truck;
- the purchase invoice or auction sales invoice;
- any COPRA transport permit for food crops moved within the country;
- crop board release or movement documents for board crops.
Where produce is bought in two districts and consolidated, each council's cess covers only what was bought in its area. Keep separate receipts per lot.
Who collects the cess and how is it paid?
| Body | Role in cess | Instrument |
|---|---|---|
| District, town, municipal or city council | Sets the rate by by-law, issues receipts, runs checkpoints | Cap. 290 ss.6, 7, 17 and Schedule |
| President's Office, Regional Administration and Local Government (PO-RALG) | Supervises councils, runs the TAUSI revenue system | Cap. 290; PO-RALG systems |
| TMX, AMCOS and warehouse operators | Add cess to the buyer's invoice in auction crops and remit it | TMX procedure 2026/27; crop season guidelines |
| Crop boards | Licence buyers, set season rules, collect their own industry levies | Crop industry Acts and regulations |
| COPRA | Requires the crop levy receipt before an export permit | Food Security regulations 2026, reg. 8(1)(d) |
| TRA | Customs clearance and national taxes; not cess | Customs and tax laws |
Councils collect through PO-RALG's TAUSI portal and point-of-sale devices, with payment against a GePG control number. The Daily News reported on 9 September 2023 that the Prime Minister described TAUSI as the improved revenue system for all councils, and ordered checks on fake receipts. Insist on a system receipt. A handwritten note is weak evidence at the next checkpoint and useless at COPRA.
Councils sometimes appoint agents to collect at barriers. Section 33 of Cap. 290 allows agents for rates on persons outside the council's area. Pay only against a council receipt or a control number, never cash to an individual.
How does cess interact with crop board levies and the service levy?
Three charges are often confused. They have different laws and different collectors.
- Crop board and industry levies. Boards and trust funds charge their own levies under crop laws. In cotton, the 2026/27 season guideline lists council cess, the Cotton Development Trust Fund levy and the cooperative levy as three separate payments due within 48 hours. See our cotton buying licence guide and the overview of Tanzania's crop boards. A board levy does not replace council cess.
- Auction and warehouse charges. Warehouse receipt crops carry per-kilogram charges for the cooperative, warehouse operator, transport and bags, then cess on top. Our guide to the warehouse receipt system covers the mechanics.
- Service levy. Corporate entities pay a service levy of 0.25% of turnover net of VAT and excise to the council where each branch sits. The rate was set by the Finance Act 2025 (Act No. 11 of 2025) from 1 July 2025 (F0283). See our service levy guide.
Section 17(7) is the provision buyers should know. It says service levy rates are payable "in lieu of the industrial cess" and that "corporate entities paying service levy shall not be liable to pay the produce cess". The same words sat in section 16(7) of the 2019 revision. On its plain words, a company that pays service levy should not also pay produce cess.
Practice is less tidy. Councils routinely bill companies for cess, and auction invoices add it automatically. Before relying on section 17(7), a company should confirm it is paying service levy, find out which council receives it, and get a written legal opinion. Refusing to pay at a checkpoint is a poor way to test the point. Route any dispute through an advocate.
Which by-laws and receipts should a buyer check?
The cess rate lives in each council's by-law, not in the Act. Section 21 of Cap. 290 requires a council to give notice of a rate within fifteen days after the resolution, and says a rate is invalid without that notice. Before the season, ask each council for:
- the by-law and its rate per crop, with the date of publication;
- the price basis it uses, if it charges per bag or per kilogram;
- the collection points and the payment channel;
- its practice on transit loads carrying another council's receipt.
The register lines that apply are F0547 (crop cess cap), NEW-05-27 (what councils may and may not charge) and F0283 (service levy), all in the Zatra government fees handbook at 26 September 2026.
Worked example: 30 tonnes of sesame through two districts
This example is hypothetical. A Dar es Salaam trading company buys 30 tonnes of sesame at a TMX auction in a southern sesame district. It then trucks the lot to Dar es Salaam through two other districts. The winning price of TZS 2,600 per kg is an assumption for illustration. The council's by-law rate is assumed at the 3% cap.
| Line | Calculation | TZS | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sesame at winning price | 30,000 kg x 2,600 | 78,000,000 | Assumed price |
| TMX buyer charges, sesame | 30,000 kg x 242 | 7,260,000 | TMX procedure, Table 3 |
| Produce cess, source council, on price only | 3% x 78,000,000 | 2,340,000 | F0547 |
| Alternative: cess on price plus charges | 3% x 85,260,000 | 2,557,800 | Base to confirm |
| Cess in transit district 1 | Produce not grown there | 0 | Cap. 290 s.7(1)(g) |
| Cess in transit district 2 | Produce not grown there | 0 | Cap. 290 s.7(1)(g) |
| Lawful total at source | Price, charges and cess on price | 87,600,000 | Sum |
The cess works out at TZS 78 per kg. The choice of base moves it by TZS 217,800. That is worth one email to the council and TMX before bidding.
Now assume each transit district demands 3% again on the same load. That is TZS 4,680,000 of charges with no basis in the Act, or TZS 156 per kg. It doubles the margin a trader loses to cess. The defence is the source receipt, matched to the truck. If an officer insists, pay under written protest only if the load cannot otherwise move, keep the receipt, and pursue recovery later.
If the same company exports, it adds a Class A licence for exporting agriculture goods of TZS 100,000 a year (BLA121, F0865). It also pays the TPHPA certificate and inspection fees (F0376) and needs a COPRA export permit. Our sesame export guide sets out the full file.
One more case. A farmer carries 800 kg of maize to a market in the next district. No plying fee can be charged, because the load is under 1 ton. No cess can be charged on the farmer, because the farmer is the seller. The buyer at the market may owe cess to the council where the maize was grown, under that council's by-law.
What are the penalties, and can produce be seized?
Cap. 290 has modest penalties. Unpaid rates are recoverable as a civil debt with costs (s.25). Failure to pay a rate carries a fine of up to TZS 50,000 or up to three months in prison (s.26(1)). The general penalty in section 71 runs from TZS 200,000 to TZS 1,000,000, or 12 to 24 months, or both. Obstructing revenue collection is an offence under section 70. Whether each of these applies to cess, as distinct from a rate, is a point to confirm.
The Act text we read has no power to seize produce. Seizure at a barrier usually rests on a council by-law, or on the crop or food security laws that require permits for movement and trade. If a load is detained:
- ask for the written legal basis and the officer's name and council;
- show the source receipt, invoice and permits, and photograph them beside the load;
- do not sign a statement admitting an offence;
- call an advocate at once, because perishable produce loses value by the hour.
Zatra prepares the paperwork and the chronology. Representation, release applications, prosecutions and claims for recovery belong with an advocate.
Can you object to a cess demand or get a refund?
Cap. 290 does not set out a refund procedure for cess. Section 37(1)(e) lets the Minister make rules for appeals against assessments. Section 24(2) lets a council reduce or remit a rate. For a wrong or duplicated cess, the practical route is a written complaint to the District Executive Director and the council treasurer. Attach the source receipt and the second receipt, and ask for a refund or a credit.
If the council refuses, escalate to the Regional Administrative Secretary and PO-RALG through the PO-RALG website. Where the sum justifies it, an advocate can challenge the by-law or sue to recover. Keep every receipt for at least five years, because TRA may also ask for them when testing purchase costs.
Did Finance Act 2025 or 2026 change produce cess?
No change to cess was found in either Act. The Finance Act 2026 (Act No. 2 of 2026), assented to on 30 June 2026, amends Cap. 290 in Part XIII. It halves the councils' share of land rent from twenty to ten percent and requires councils to set aside 15% of own-source revenue for women, youth, disability groups and markets. It does not touch section 7(1)(g) or the Schedule. EY's analysis of 17 July 2026 reports the same Cap. 290 changes and no cess amendment.
The Finance Act 2025 amended sections 6 and 7 for the service levy at 0.25%. The produce cess cap in the Schedule still reads 3%.
How does Zanzibar differ from the Mainland?
Cap. 290 is Mainland law. Local government is not a Union matter, so it does not reach Zanzibar's councils.
| Point | Mainland | Zanzibar |
|---|---|---|
| Governing law | Local Government Finances Act, Cap. 290 | Zanzibar's own local government law (confirm) |
| Crop cess cap | 3% of farm-gate price | Unknown; not confirmed |
| Collector | District and urban councils | Zanzibar local authorities (confirm) |
| Export permit link | COPRA asks for the crop levy receipt | Zanzibar crop and trade authorities (confirm) |
| Customs | TRA | TRA (Union matter) |
We could not confirm whether Zanzibar councils levy a produce cess, at what rate, or how a Mainland receipt is treated on arrival. Ask the receiving authority before contracting a cross-channel consignment.
What to do now
- Map your buying districts. List every council where you will buy, and every district your trucks will cross.
- Get each by-law in writing. Ask each buying council for its rate, price basis, collection points and transit practice.
- Confirm the base. For auction crops, ask TMX or the AMCOS whether cess runs on the price alone or on price plus charges.
- Price the cess into your bid. Add cess, auction charges and board levies to the per-kg cost before you commit.
- Pay against a control number. Take a system receipt that names the crop, quantity, council and vehicle.
- Travel with the file. Carry the source receipt, invoice and any COPRA or crop board movement documents on every truck.
- Test section 17(7) properly. If you are a company paying service levy, take a written opinion before you stop paying cess.
- Escalate duplicates in writing. Pay any disputed demand under protest only if necessary, then claim it back from the council.
- Call an advocate on seizure. Do not sign admissions; have the advocate seek release and handle any charge.
Key dates
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 14 March 1983 | Local Government Finances Act in force (GN 206 of 1983) |
| 2017 | Finance Act 2017 (Act No. 4 of 2017, s.32) rewrites the Schedule: 3% cap and 1 ton plying fee bar |
| 30 November 2019 | Revised Edition 2019; service levy proviso at s.16(7) |
| 1 July 2025 | Service levy fixed at 0.25% by the Finance Act 2025 |
| 28 October 2025 | R.E. 2023 Annual Supplement 2025 signed; proviso now s.17(7) |
| 12 February 2026 | TMX trading procedure for 2026/27 issued, with 3% cess on sesame and pulses |
| 30 June 2026 | Finance Act 2026 assented; COPRA regulations published with the crop levy receipt rule |
| 1 July 2026 | Finance Act 2026 in force; produce cess unchanged |
| Before each season | Collect council by-law rates and the auction cess base in writing |
How Zatra helps
Zatra's sector permits service collects council by-law rates, maps the receipts each consignment needs and prepares buyer registrations with COPRA and the crop boards. Our import and export compliance team builds the export file, and our guide to food crop export permits explains the COPRA side. Cashew buyers can start with our cashew buying licence guide.
Cess, levies, licence fees and permit fees are paid by the client to each authority at the official rate against its control number. They are separate from Zatra's professional fee; our note on professional fees and government fees explains the split.
Councils, COPRA, the crop boards, TMX and TRA decide every rate, permit and release. Zatra prepares and coordinates the file; it does not decide or guarantee any authority's outcome. Seizures, prosecutions, by-law challenges, refund claims in court and formal legal opinions on section 17(7) go to Zatra's advocate.
Sources and status
Accurate as at 24 October 2026. Settled: cess is a council charge under Cap. 290, payable at source, on buyers, capped at 3% for cash and food crops, with sellers, seeds and loads up to 1 ton protected. Verify: each council's rate and base, the 5% export crop wording against the 3% cap, the reach of section 17(7), and whether the s.26 penalty applies to cess. Unknown: the Zanzibar position.
- Cap. 290 R.E. 2023, Annual Supplement 2025: Office of the Attorney General, signed 28 Oct 2025. Accessed 24 Oct 2026.
- Cap. 290 R.E. 2019: Ministry of Finance copy, revised to 30 Nov 2019. Accessed 24 Oct 2026.
- Finance Act 2026: TRA copy, assented 30 Jun 2026, Part XIII. Accessed 24 Oct 2026.
- Food Security (Registration, Permits and Licensing) Regulations, 2026: COPRA, published 30 Jun 2026, reg. 8(1)(d). Accessed 24 Oct 2026.
- TMX commodity trading procedure, 12 Feb 2026, and the PO-RALG and TAUSI portals: linked in the text. Accessed 24 Oct 2026.
- ANAPRI and SUA trade brief, May 2026; MSU ASPIRES brief, Nov 2016; Feed the Future on Agrilinks (undated); Daily News, 9 Sep 2023; EY, 17 Jul 2026; Mwananchi, 25 Sep 2025. Accessed 24 Oct 2026.
Figures to confirm before you act
- Council rate: 3% is the cap (F0547); each council's by-law sets the actual rate, often lower or per unit
- Cess base in auctions: TMX prints "+ 3% CESS" without stating the base; confirm with TMX and the council
- Major export crops: ss.6(1)(u) and 7(1)(g) say up to 5%; the Schedule bars more than 3%; confirm with the council
- Section 17(7): whether a service levy paying company is exempt from produce cess in practice; take an advocate's opinion
- Penalties: confirm whether s.26 and s.71 apply to cess and what the council by-law adds
- COPRA regulations: the file name says GN 158P and the text says 258P; confirm in the Gazette
- Zanzibar: whether a produce cess exists and at what rate
- Worked example: the TZS 2,600 per kg price and the 3% rate are assumptions
- Register lines cited: F0547, NEW-05-27, F0283, BLA121, F0865 and F0376 at 26 September 2026; the control number governs on payment
This article is general information based on official sources available at the date of publication. It is not legal, tax or financial advice. Laws and notices change. Verify with the issuing authority or consult Zatra before acting.
Frequently asked questions
Is produce cess the same as VAT or income tax?
No. Cess is a local government charge collected by councils under Cap. 290. VAT and income tax are national taxes collected by TRA. Paying one does not discharge the other, and cess receipts go to the council's own revenue.
Does a farmer selling own produce at the market need a business licence?
Usually not. The Business Licensing Act excludes farming and the sale of a farmer's own produce that has not been materially processed (NEW-08-16). A trader who buys to resell does need a licence.
Can a village council charge its own crop levy?
Village by-laws on fees are subject to the limits in written law and to the district council's rates, under section 9 of Cap. 290. A village charge on top of the district cess on the same produce should be questioned in writing.
Is livestock or fish subject to produce cess?
The cess item in the Schedule covers crops and forest produce. Livestock carries a market fee at auction marts, and fish carries a landing or auction levy only where the council provides the facility. Neither is a produce cess.
What if a checkpoint demands cess on goods bought outside Tanzania?
Cess attaches to produce grown in the council's area. Imported grain carries customs documents from TRA instead. Show the customs entry and release order, and ask for the written basis of any council demand.
Can a council charge cess on processed products such as flour or oil?
The Act speaks of agricultural or other produce and bars cess on timber products such as furniture. Councils differ on processed goods. Ask for the by-law item that names the product before paying.
How long should cess receipts be kept?
Keep them for at least five years with the purchase invoices. They support the cost of goods in the income tax return, the COPRA export file and any refund claim against a council.
Can a trader pay cess for a whole season in advance?
Some councils agree lump-sum or monthly settlement with large buyers. That is a matter for the by-law and a written agreement with the council. Make sure each load still has a receipt or reference it can show in transit.
Sources & regulators
Verify before filing: Rates, forms and thresholds move by Finance Act, Government Notice and portal revision. Confirm the live schedule on the mandate-holder portal before you budget or submit. Law-firm alerts and Big Four notes are discovery only.
- Local Government Finances Act, Cap. 290 R.E. 2023, Annual Supplement 2025: Office of the Attorney General (OCPD), amendments to 31 Jul 2025, signed 28 Oct 2025; ss.6(1)(u), 7(1)(g), 7(1)(z), 17, 21, 24 to 26, 33, 37, 70, 71 and Schedule item 1 read 24 Oct 2026; primary source. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- Local Government Finance Act, Cap. 290 R.E. 2019: Ministry of Finance copy, revised to 30 Nov 2019; s.16(7) and Schedule annotated Act No. 4 of 2017 s.32; primary source. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- The Finance Act, 2026 (Act No. 2 of 2026): Tanzania Revenue Authority copy, assented 30 Jun 2026, in force 1 Jul 2026; Part XIII ss.48 to 53 amend Cap. 290 without touching cess; primary source. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- Food Security (Registration, Permits and Licensing) Regulations, 2026: COPRA, published 30 Jun 2026; reg. 8(1)(d) crop levy receipt for export permits, reg. 11 transport permit; GN number to confirm; primary source. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- TMX Commodity Trading Procedure 2026/2027: Tanzania Mercantile Exchange PLC, issued 12 Feb 2026; Table 3 sesame charges TZS 242 per kg plus 3% cess paid by the buyer. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- Unlocking Tanzania's Agricultural Trade Potential: Practical Solutions to Removing Trade Barriers: ANAPRI and Sokoine University of Agriculture trade brief, May 2026; independent source on cess multiplying across districts and checkpoints. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- Agricultural produce cess reform, Policy Reform Brief No. 2: Michigan State University ASPIRES team, Nov 2016; independent source on council dependence on cess. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- Tax reforms benefit farmers and traders: a case of tea production and marketing in Tanzania: Feed the Future on Agrilinks, Mwambulukutu, Minde and Nyange, published after the 2017 Finance Act (date not shown, read 2026); independent source on the cut from 5% to 3% and the 1 ton exemption. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- REVENUE LOSSES: State tightens noose: Daily News, Rodgers Luhwago, 9 Sep 2023; independent source on the TAUSI council revenue system. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- Tanzanian Finance Act, 2026 analysis: EY Global Tax News, 17 Jul 2026; independent source on the Cap. 290 amendments. Accessed 2026-10-24.
- Serikali kujadili utitiri wa tozo kwenye zao la parachichi Njombe: Mwananchi, Seif Jumanne, 25 Sep 2025; independent source on council crop levy complaints in Njombe. Accessed 2026-10-24.
Disclaimer
This article is informational orientation. It is not legal, tax or investment advice and not a government decision. Tanzanian instruments move by Act, Government Notice, Finance Act and portal revision. If a sentence here disagrees with the live mandate-holder, the mandate-holder wins. Zatra Consultants Limited does not issue licences, permits, tax clearances or approvals, and gives no assurance of any regulatory or banking outcome. Professional fees are published only on /pricing/.
